" /> Floozy Speak!: August 2008 Archives

« July 2008 | Main | September 2008 »

August 29, 2008

Valley of the Turks

So I wanted to share some data that I've been collecting talking to various folks participating on Amazon's Mechanical Turk

When I tell people about Mechanical Turk, most look at the service with serious disbelief that a place, an environment like Turk could ever exist.  Why do they do the tasks on there?  Are they all from India?  No one in their right mind would be on here and doing these various tasks.  Yet, turks live on participating on the site every day doing bit tasks for all kinds of requestors.   

In one of my studies I decided to ask the turks flat out, why do you do what you do?  Keep in mind this is a small sample set of 20 people.

It's Vegas Baby.

One of the most common "freakouts" from normal people I talk to is - Why the hell would anyone do a 3 cent task or HIT(human initiated task)? 

Turks are motivated by fun and fast cash.  Think about it.  Turk represents a pot of gold online.  The real task isn't doing the tasks per say, its finding easy tasks with decent payouts.  Turkers pride themselves on finding fast good deals for their time.  They also don't typically just go to Turk to do real work, many are multitasking doing other work, watching TV, or are simply bored and looking for something else to do.   A few are even confused why they are still there doing tasks for 3 cents when they know its a raw deal.  Its almost like a Vegas addiction thing- sure I lose but I also have the potential to make big. 

What about rewards?

Its also important that not all tasks are 3 cents on Turk.  It tends to get that rep, but there are plenty of $1-$7 tasks on turk along the allure of rewards and bonuses from various requestors. 

Participation in rewards on turk is kinda murky.  For those that know about them, and activily seek them out they seem to be a decent deal, to many however they're kinda extra grey material.  Basically the vibe is, sure nice, but don't count on it.  Rewards are usually given to turks based on how fast they complete a HIT or if they give great info.  In my studies I gave nice rewards to those turks that really worked hard to articulate how mechanical turk worked and or how they really felt.  As a researcher, or anyone really, you can see BS or not pretty easily these days.  Clearly turks aren't too hopeful for rewards though, they seem to occur infrequently for them.

What a waste of time!

Another popular misconnection people outside of turk seem to apply on turk is that turks blow hundreds of hours on the service, reinforcing the idea that turk is a massive waste of time and money. 

Most turks are seeking out fast one hit wonder like tasks, which is why they typically fall prey to the 3 cent HITs.  When they do choose to do a task that will take 30 minutes to an hour, they expect to be paid alot more, still far below most peoples standards.  But again, remember most turks don't come to turk for work.  Its extra fun, multitask activity etc.

Friends and Family

Turks we're a bit split down the middle on whether or not they shared their turk interest with family and friends.  Some shared their success cash making adventures with family and in turn created more turks in the system while a few we're down right cautious to insure that they didn't creat more competition for themselves. 

Got to get paid!

I wondered what was the most a turk ever got paid on a HIT, so I asked them.

Turks who cashed in on $5 to $25 hits typically we're writing reviews for websites, books or rewriting marketing & PR content, a few even did web site redesign bits.  The average win however is more like a buck or two. 

Influence...

So what influences a turk to do what they do?

Easy fast cash, can't beat that, that's pretty clear and obvious, however there are other influences as well.  Several turks like the idea of repeat tasks.  They did it before, it took X time with Y reward, let's do it again.  Expectations are set nice and clear, the road to warm successful feelings is there.  A few turks actively seek out requestors who post fun, rewarding, cash worthy tasks.  These turks talk about having a kind of relationship with that requestor, they know not only what to expect from that requestor, but look forward to working with them, to do the task, to help achieve a goal for them.    Lastly turks like to do tasks that match their skill set.  So they'll do long, possibly involved tasks if those tasks match what they like to do already, might as well get paid. 

Been turkin for long?

Most turks I talked to have either just recently started out using Mechanical Turk or have been part of the system for over a year.  What really surprised me was the number of folks who just recently got started using turk, again it made me think of the pot of gold online they could potentially be seeing.  We're also coming off the wake of oil spikes where consumers were looking around anyone to help scrape up a few bucks to pay for expensive gas. 

The news media both online and offline did a pretty good job alerting folks to turk, because it popped up often in my response data to question How did you find out about Mechanical Turk?  Nearly half of them heard about turk via the news online or offline, all related to story pieces about how to make an extra buck at home.  Other turks found the service searching for it and other like services such as- surveys for cash, work at home etc.

Ever thought of playing for the other team?

Another question I had for turks was whether or not any of them tried out being a requestor asking for work to do be done versus just being the worker.  A few have considered putting tasks in themselves but generally, no, most of them were workers.

The quest continues.

There's more data here but you get the idea, turks are real humans folks.  Previous people have done more demographic studies, and I'll you this bit, 80% of these people are from the states.  For me, the studies continue, I find Mechnical Turk a facsinating ecosystem to observe, participate in and study upon.  I use them constantly at work engaging turks to help me in sometimes odd and unique ways, always in the hopes to pull up yet another few data points for a project.  Its still hard to hang your hat on their data output, but you'd be surprised at just how normal these folks are, and that is my core point here.  This isn't a system of freaks, if you look at it that way, you might as well direct that lens of clarity upon yourself as well, or anyone who spends any time online.

5 Dollar Data Updated

View SlideShare presentation or Upload your own. (tags: amazon mechanica)

For me the quest continues, I'll keep you posted!

Powered by Qumana

August 27, 2008

Google's big problem, info freeloaters and advertising.

I know folks love Google, I like them too, but I'm also torn on just what their end goal is these days.  They make oodles on potential awareness for their customers.  Its seems like one big gamble for folks these days.  Google owns the search real estate so there for you must pay to be on their lawn at the right time.  Yet does that placement get you the sale?  I wonder.

GMail, love it, and yeah it serves up ads all day long along side my emails.  In the two years i've used GMail I've never once clicked on an ad.  Google sells attention space right there while I'm reading my email, yet, I never think to look over there at those ads, they aren't on my radar. 

Google likes to think it knows where the radar is, it plans ahead on getting in my face, allowing anyone to widgetize their ad service, serving it up all over the web.  You see it in new beta apps, social networks, blogs, you name it, odds are theres an side bar somewhere looking into the context of whatever is being discussed and then offering additional goodness in the form of ads.  To me, this is all wasted.  I have never clicked on a Google ad in a social network, beta app, blog space, etc etc etc. I didn't go there to click on ads, I went there to consume some information, view a movie, read a comment, participate in a discussion, yet for some reason, there's that Google guy standing in the background with that big white board on him saying, "hey I hear ya'll talking about robotic babies.. did ya know XYZ has robo babies in six colors!!?!!?" thanks man, but no and I don't care.

Where did Google go wrong?  Clearly its still making money.  Sure its making money but is anyone actually making money off it?  Is the game just all about selling potential awareness?  I thought advertising was supposed to get me closer to buying something real.  I suppose they just pimp it out, and hope for the best. 

They know the 900 million dollar deal to pimp out MySpace isn't going so well.  Again, its bad solution for that environment, and thats what bothers me.  Google isn't thinking about people any more, its not offering value, its just trying to be everywhere you go, every page you visit will have some banner space scraping text and applying a contextual formula to the discussion and serving up an ad, pimping a player to the scene who can attempt to interface with my attention that is clearly not looking at it.  Epic fail. 

When will Google's advertising bubble arrive?  When will it have to rethink attention, figure out new ways to really captialize on how people use the web?  I think they're slipping.  Attention is shifting, and freeloaters are carving Google up and then some.  They are like free highway of the web, no tolls, lots of data, servered up, sure they can advertise all they want but most folks just go from A to B never thinking about that side banner ad area. Least I don't.

There's a constant quest for monetization of the web these days.  I wonder if we'll ever reach a point where you simply can't monetize it, and that mindset is the wrong one to have in the first place.  I think it was an initial obvious play for Google to serve up adsense to people to make them think that, yeah, i can pimp you out to who ever via search, but it doesn't assure you a click, or a buy, or a won over customer.  Its a great deal for Google, I still don't think its a good deal for anyone pimping key words.  Unless you're simply in the biz of landing on that search radar, you pay for that landing moment. 

The only time I pay attention to ads is when I go to a space where they are at, search.  I expect them there.  But the world is set on serving them up where ever I go, constantly getting in my face, thinking that while I'm in x tool, x app, x space, x place I'll want to click on that yummy ad over there.  Highly doubtful, haven't done it yet.

I wonder if Google could tell us those facts.  For the installed based of users in GMail, how many actually click on an ad in that space while reading email?  Or on YouTube etc?

I think Google should spend more time figuring out how people get in and out through Google search vs all this ad awareness bs.  They should be analyzing how people think, how people use spaces and less figuring out how to make that real estate seem viable to ads. 

Google's about to make a few more big purchases because attention is shifting.  They are seriously jealous of traffic magnets.  They don't like being out of the loop of someone elses trafffic.  They dislike not owning the real estate.  In fact thats their business really, its not search, or ads, its real estate. 

Where's attention going?  Well I'd say twitter, apple iphone, facebook etc etc...  And while I love them I really love them for google calendar, docs and gmail i feel like big ass freeloater on their services.  I eat them up whole hog but I don't understand their other efforts.  I get in, and get out and move on.  I don't click on their ads in spaces I don't expect to see them.  I don't go to Whole Foods to buy video games, I don't go to Blockbuster to find corn.  And while Google does a good job at serving up related context, the problem remains the same for me, I didn't go there for that purpose.  I went to a blog to read a post, not click on an ad. 

Ads haven't evolved much either.  They are still in the segmented space where you've trained the masses to think that in this part of the browser, odds are these are ads, and while they may be contextually relevant, they are still ads.  They've changed shape, color, wittyness but still are ads, you are still pimping that space for anothers gain not my own.  I don't look at it as benefit space.  You've trained me not look at it as a benefit but as an ad. 

I wonder if anyone would think 20 years from now, Google missed out on a massive global chance to be more benefical to the end user vs being the pimp they are today.

Powered by Qumana

August 25, 2008

Rise of the Creative Clash

Remember that book, Rise of the Creative Class?  Lately I've been thinking about Rise of the Creative Clash.  I keep running into people that cannot for the life of them get things like unconferences, twitter, social media, social networks, the web where its at right now and more. 

Having conversations with these people are tiring for both parties.  You believe, they do not, and you can explain to an extent but you're not used to continually defending something you just know clicks for you.  Its hard to explain.  It could be an idea that crosses over into faith, who knows, but the clash is present and it bothers both of ya. 

I suppose this has been going on for awhile now as the web grows up.  Maybe we all clash in different ways.  I defintely don't use MySpace or FaceBook like other folks do, so I clash there.  

It all comes down to what you want to do with your moments.  Everyone values their moments in different ways.  They think you are wasting time, yet they don't see how it enables your life, your ideas, your process.  You see connection with the web, with people, with the moment, with the now, they don't.  They compare it to traditional aspects like IM or blogs, yet for you its clearly more than that. 

In the end, you really can't defend it, you could I suppose but eventually that becomes too tiring, and then you yourself end up wasting time preaching to an audience that doesn't get what music is in the first place.  They are stuck, you are stuck which breaks it all down into one simple statement.

You either get it, or you don't, and this is the Rise of the Creative Clash. 

Powered by Qumana

August 24, 2008

Ugh so what's new?

First, this blog seriously needs help. 

I spend nearly all my "web" time in other tools and sites these days.  Twitter, Google Reader, Youtube, and various other places.  I hardly blog.  Sometimes I think about cool ideas but they go into my backpackit page or get blurted out on Utterz or Twitter. 

I post book updates to GoodReads keeping a long list of "things to read", which I rarely get around to reading.  I miss my subscription to SimplyAudioBooks, maybe I should give that another try.  But in reality I really just need an AUX in port on the Mini, but the 2002 never got one.  I wonder what it would cost to rig one up......

...(just did a bit of research..) apparently doing an AUX ipod port on the 2002 Mini is much harder than expected.  I'll have to call the dealer to see what they can do and or find a local car audio shop, there's gotta be a way to hack through to the speakers.  

In other news I've been playing Calliflower.com lately participating in Alec Saunders SquawkBox confernece call sessions, mainly for fun and curious intent.  I like Calliflower, we'll have to put it to use sometime at work. 

My Columbus Startup Weekend project spotWurk continues onward, we're working toward the Sept. 8th pitch deadline.  My top concerns are still team unity on just what we're making.  The idea seems to shift around alot, we make a pizza one day, a salad the next, but in the end we still serve up a good meal for brands and consumers.  Just need everyone to nod together on something. 

I tend to get too self obsessed with unit I figure, so I walk away from it, praying it will sort itself out.  Competition allows us to focus as well.  Sounds crazy but its nice to have some competition on the scene cause it gives us data points we didn't have before, how are they doing dealing with various aspects of the overall concept. 

My facisnation with Mechanical Turk continues however.  I used it 3 times last week, all with decent results.  Getting fast data is highly addictive, its mass fast participation.  Faster than email, web posting or twitter, Turk has this audience just waiting for something to chew on.  You serve it up, and it will be done.  Thats nice.

Aside from Turk being labled a crowdsourcing virtual sweatshop its actually very useful and fun to observe.  Looking at it right now I see all kinds of new and unique assignments I haven't seen before.  I think the word is getting out on Turk and more and more people are using it, and not just to help some search engine see images via tags.  

In fact I actually see alot of ummm how should I say, semi-naughty projects on Turk right now.  Stuff like go write 5 book reviews for website, do my homework for me, comment on my blog, go generate some web traffic for me.  Tisk tisk, yet doable in the end if people want to do it. 

Here's an odd one, draw a portrait of "this girl", or go log into my new beta app, create an account, contribute some stuff and leave.  Now you don't even need real consumers to make your product interesting and lively, we got Turk!  Some of these are actually paying pretty well, especially considering many of them you have to setup accounts on etc.  Still pretty sad when ya gotta pay people to go use your product.  But that happens everywhere, all the time. 

Here's another interesting one, download some flyers and post them around town, take a picture of you posting these flyers up. 

Another fake poster one, sadly these tasks just ask people to go create more noise, more fake data.  This one asks turks to create links to their music site using various social networking sites.  You'd think much of this could be faked, and in reality, I bet alot of early adopters and especailly anyone doing Turk related activity probably has multiple personas online, just to keep themselves sane from requests like this one.

Powered by Qumana

Real Power

Real Power isn't in ideas its in conviction of a truth.  A truth is the manifestation of your idea.  What truth does it bring to the table?  What truth do you propose for the masses?  Why is your truth better than all these other truths? 

Conviction in your truth is what makes for a bond in a mind.  A bond that explodes a river of promises, possibilities, experiences and expectations.  You tee it up and it keeps on coming back over and over, your truth, deliving via your conviction.

You must believe, and yet you must stand far enough back from the truth so that it really flies on its own, continually shaping it from stage to stage in its life cycle. 

You are the artist but the painting is lifeless without an audience to fuel it.  Fuel your ideas, let them be exposed, drive their truths through obstcles with your conviction. 

Man all that sounds really deep and I dunno why I felt compelled to spell all that out.  Maybe I was a just a truth I had rolling around in my mind, a truth that with the right amount of conviction, even in a blog post like this, could explode in your mind, allowing you to see what I see in that we need truth + convictiong to manifest our dreams.

Powered by Qumana

August 22, 2008

Oh my poor blog...

What do I say on here any more?  I kinda don't know.  I've shifted.  I've gone from a soap box screamer to a twittering, google reader sharing fiend o matic. 

I need to re-invent this space big time.  Mass redo. Rewind and plug back into what'm really doing. 

Powered by Qumana

August 12, 2008

BarCampOhio thoughts..

So yesterday I checked out BarCampOhio at OCLC.  Afterall it is our first BarCamp in cowtown, had to go to it.  To my normal friends, they thought I was going to martiniCamp or letsgetDrunkFEST, most of them don't know what a BarCamp is, understandably so.  Its kind of a west - east coast thing and not much of mid-west thing.  Until now! 

So what is it?  Its an unconference.  The basic gist of the idea.  People meet, toss ideas on a wall of what they want to talk/learn about, crowd votes or decides what to talk about, go off into your groups discuss it.  The idea is to have no set agenda on what you want to talk about, and discussions occur out of the ether of life.  This can be good and bad based on how the session is facilitated. 

Personally I think folks are hungry for some leadership, a dash of setting expectations is nice really.  Makes me warm inside when I get a little win from "oh yeah, i'm ready" vs the "oh crap, what the hell are we doing".  But thats just me.

Unconference purists would see my damning words and call me a... ummm.. something.  But anyways here's how BarCampOhio went down.

1. It was really more like LibraryCamp.  It had a strong overtones of library needs and or focus.  Most of the PR that got the people there were all from the library side of life.  Sa'll good, just call it LibraryCamp next time, I'll still go.  Some of the conversations in my head just didnt apply to the library theme, so that was an expectation that didn't work out. 

2. Kicking off an unconference sucks.  That first hour of people gathering, introductions and waiting for the "rules or faciliator to address people" sucks.  It was too loose.  Not enough clarity.  I wrote down "dying on a vine".  I would like to go around the room and people just say what ya do.  Get that out in the air.

3. Sometimes instead of ideas up on a wall, maybe we should frame them into- theme and problem.  What is the theme of this event, a huge highlevel thing like "create" or "mobile" or whatever, and then present the next level- what are the problems.  I guess this could be too much structure for an unconference.  But I for one, had trouble figuring out what I could talk about with various groups that formed up.  I ended up in the social media pool mainly cause I felt I could contribute there.  But if we threw up ideas as problems, odds are I could of referenced the idea better in my head and then address anyones table chiming in on solutions based on my neck of the woods experience.

4. All my technology died.  Side note really.  My laptop, dead.  Chumby no wanna work.  Iphone, gets wifi but cant get out to access anything.  Sucked.  Jody, however reminded me it was probably good cause I talked alot more.

5. I started to think about the kinds of people at unconferences:

seeders, submit ideas

butterflies, like to visit everyone table, get a taste of everything

bulls, authority magnets, this is how stuff works, period

bandwagons, kinda like butterflies but more eager to agree at whatever the energy is pointing at

6.  Once we got into groups, that was good, good conversation occured.

7.  More pen, colorful postits, and whiteboards required.

8. Sponsors should get some kind of pre-sponsor pack that helps tee them up for success at an unconference.  TMobile gave us lunch and it was good, but I felt like they did this defacto standard pitch to us as if they came to your house or company and wanted you to buy thier service.  To be more successful, sponsors should be teed up for what kinds of approaches could be good to ask unconference attendies.  I need more thought on this idea but I think they could of got alot more out of their sponsor bit then to just talk to us about rate plans and what not.  They could of used that moment to pull some insights out of us, get a vibe for how we feel etc. 

9. I was really suprised that the library folks I talked to didn't know about Bishop Hartley Highschool and their digital revolution of the classroom there.  They are a massive case study unfolding daily in town.

10. Some big ideas?  Well the usual, why blog, why not, fears over blogging, corp PR vs individual, talk twitter, etc.  One idea I liked was the library listening post- a big 30" LCD that aggerated current searches in blogs, twitter, youtube, etc all around "library like" key words.  This was mainly an immersive tool for the staff of the organization to see and witness what was currently going on in the web.  Rather than to beat them into submission, blog or else, they see the affects of how users search the web use library terms, related language and then they can decide on whether or not they want to be a part of the scene basically.  I like this idea cause it can inform many folks in a passive way thats not threating.  There was a lot of talk around why should I blog, why do I need to be there and they're really correct, without proof or any evidence to toss at them, you're trying to swim up creek, you'll lose eventually.  So rather than cornering them and telling this is why, show them why, see if they can see what you see and then perhaps they'll start think the web differently. 

11. Take aways.  When closed for the day I brought the issue up of take aways.  I think BarCamp events need solid take aways from folks, expressed on paper, camera, don't care but I think you need to walk out of the building as if you acomplished something, express it, tell me what you acomplished.  That data helps everyone see what we need to rally in and celebrate and what we need to fix next time around.

Powered by Qumana