thou must be PURE..PURE I SAY!
So the other day i debated creating a youtube director account vs going to some other competitive service and well I tried. I tried revver and it looked cool, somewhat promising, still felt clunky with their uploader and general UI, but i tried.. and i failed cause my videos are not pure of heart.
Meaning that revver is great for totally pure of heart productions, that is productions that have none, nada, no infringements of any kind and its not really clear what all counts for infringements in this new hyper wired world we live in.. i mean what all pisses people off?!
People we are in a remix take this take that world. Personally it should been seen as flattery to use someone's music as yer intro piece, i mean yer doin this for fun.. ok and a bit of profit if you can, but mainly fun and fame.
Anyways unless i start humming my own intro music pieces i dont see myself on revver any time soon. Even then i wonder if the transitions i used in the editing software or the places i shot the video, do i really own everything in that shot? i mean i bought the music and that still wasnt good enough... I dunno.
Anal aspects like that kill the infective nature that those services really need to take off. There's a line between minor use and major rip off.
I think youtube is the same way they just take a different stance on it, its more of a "if someone gets pissed... we'll yank it" vs killin the idea right outa the starting gate.